RS (rainbowstevie) wrote,
RS
rainbowstevie

WHY HALO THAR, AUSIELLO.

1. Question: Got any scoop on Jim and Pam’s relationship on The Office? -- Sara
Ausiello: With a bigger budget comes...fake rain? Rumor has it that something momentous (and long overdue) takes place between the star-crossed lovers during a torrential downpour.


. . .

DON'T. DON'T YOU DARE SCREW WITH ME ON THIS, AUSIELLO. DON'T YOU DARE. BECAUSE THAT WOULD MAKE UP FOR ANDY'S EXISTENCE AND BRING ME BACK. IT TOTALLY WOULD.

*tramples on hopes* Die, die, die! No deal without proof of engagement!

Although, on second thought, I don't think they've even properly said 'I love you' on screen. That would count as momentous without being too obvious for Ausiello, right? That probably wouldn't bring me back, but it would make me feel more benevolent in the future.

Oh, that's a lie, after ten minutes of brief euphoria I'm back to my standard position of "Shun. No unshun." *steals copious amounts of raw material for daydream concoction and runs*


In a related note:
'Question: Do you have good news about House and Cameron? -- Aleki
Ausiello: They're not getting killed off anytime soon. That's good, right? Meanwhile, I've got great news for House-Cuddy 'shippers: Sources confirm to me exclusively that your favorite couple will finally lock lips in episode 6! And for
real!

I have only two words: um guh.

And then I direct you to my previous warning about screwing with my head. Although I am much less invested in this, I live in eternal fear that the writers will someday cut their losses and make House/Wilson canon...well, more officially canon...so I'm all for this news.
Tags: house, speculation, spoilers, the office
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments