?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Of her many pursuits, I think writing episodes of The Office is the one she pulls off least successfully, but she is a VERY delightful human being and that translates well to writing about herself, as after reading this excerpt I want her book right now. Just check out her awesome feelings on one night stands. I mean, how embarrassing would it be if some guy tried to rape and murder you, and you couldn't even give the detective his last name? She's seen Law & Order: SVU. She knows how it works. (I also like how she called out the cupcake store manager for commenting on how often she'd come in recently. RIGHT?? You don't remind people of their poor food choices, lady)
~~~~~~
Dear John, The Movie:  I wasn't at all interested when it came out. In the immortal words of Mike Chang, "I want Channing Tatum to stop being in stuff," and Amanda Seyfried annoys me more than words can express with her bushbaby eyes. I also want Nicholas Sparks to stop writing stuff that gets turned into movies, so clearly, this movie does not have a lot going for it.

[note: in the interest of full disclosure, this was written on Sunday night and I just didn't get around to posting it.]

But when I saw it at the library, the cover suddenly looked super attractive to me, so I figured what the hell. Channing Tatum with just-barely-decent-length hair reminds me of Chase on last fall's Survivor, who won me over and whom I in turn modeled the male half of the couple in Breathing after; yadda yadda yadda, the Southern gentleman type of few words and strong moral center appeals to me.

It starts out all right. Amanda Seyfried's amazing long hair makes up for her face, and her character is apparently about as vice-free as a nun, which I do not buy from Amanda Seyfried AT ALL, but if they want to pretend then I'm all for it. She also rides horses and there is an autistic kid who dotes on her and vice versa. It is pretty hilarious to me that you can meet someone and fall in love in the span of 2 weeks, especially enough to commit to one year of long distance, but again, sure, if you want to go that way and have the guy be the strong link full of promises he intends to keep, bring it on!

I will even make it like 45% of the way through that scene o' sensuality, I like them so much, although I will eventually cut and run because censored or not, my patience for even the top-caliber, lyrical ballet style of onscreen lovemaking is super short. But points for trying!

Midway through the movie, though, the letters stop coming because while he was off overseas, she was busy cheating on him and getting engaged behind his back. ON NOTICE, FILM. Gonna have to do a real good job of convincing me this is a worthwhile high point of conflict, because I traditionally do not respond well to stories once they introduce extracurricular engagements.

And then all of a sudden it's 5 years later, so the chances for positive reconciliation plummet and with them my good will. OK, so two weeks and then a year of letters is probably not how you would find your soulmate in real life, but you made me believe it, despite avowed disinterest in either lead! Plus it turns out that Channing Tatum can actually shine if given just the right material to work with. I really enjoyed the fleeting portion of the film where he carried the story alone to resolve the issues with his dad.

When we return to the main plot strand, the previously unnamed husband is, in a not-at-all-shocking turn of events, autistic kid's dad. Who is kind of an asshole for doing what he did, given that he and John were on pretty friendly terms before, but whatever. Fine, she got married and it's not ideal, but it's also 5 years later so I have stopped caring about her relationship with John. No harm, no foul. Plus her husband has cancer, so that might be how they plan to hit the reset button, not that it's really necessary because my brain has moved on and so has...

NO WAIT. "She still loves you, you know. She's never looked at me the way she used to look at you." 

*throws up hands* ASSHOLES. No! Everyone in this movie is terrible! WHY DID YOU EVEN DUMP HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE? If you are going to asshole-out of a relationship, at least commit to it. Not to mention how super cliche that line is. This, right here, is some spectacularly cheeseball and frankly cop-out-y and horrible writing.  Can the story just end with him and his dad, since she seems less central to the plot than previously assumed?

Ugh. I am 15 minutes from the end and I have fought the good fight but it just went downhill so FAST that I don't know if I can stand to suffer through any more. Why is it so hard to find movies that hook your interest from the beginning, present a solid plot, and finish strong? It's like every film is just looking for an excuse to jump off the nearest cliff and go down in flames.

(I am fighting through it. EVERYTHING SHE SAYS MAKES ME WANT TO INJURE HER. NOTHING ABOUT THIS BREAKUP MAKES ANY SENSE. IT IS ALMOST LIKE SOME WRITER NEEDED TO HAVE CONFLICT TO MAKE A MARKETABLE STORY.)

(ending: ...the hell even is that? A hug I will happily construe as platonic, some additional indeterminate amount of time more than 2 months later? I mean, I know I have been yelling "NO!" about this relationship rekindling for 10 minutes straight, but I still kind of expected it. Why was this story even made! Did they chop out half of the book and leave out all the parts that made it make sense?)


In conclusion, this movie managed to overcome its original handicaps, only to commit suicide via the most ridiculous and unsympathetic relationship speed bumps imaginable.

Other movies I have picked up for the week aheadJourney to the Center of the Earth (previously shunned for genre and now invited back on the Brendan Fraser Makes Movies Awesome train), Leap Year (this film looks boring. Matthew Goode is SO BLAND. I am only seeing it because people told me I had to, and/or because of the Amy Adams Makes Movies Better principle), The Lovely Bones,  and something called Evelyn that I picked up because, what's that, Pierce Brosnan + fatherhood role + adorable little girl = GIVE IT NOW. Which one seems least likely to fail right off the bat? I choose the first one. Fraser's first two episodes of Scrubs were on last week and every time they air I marvel anew at how much I adore them.

------
EDIT: Back to books, has anyone ever read The Egg and I by Betty Macdonald, memoir by the author of the Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle books? I picked it up by chance from the library and my whole family ended up loving it. Now we want the sequels, except the library doesn't have any more, I see rumors about them being out of print, and I can't seem to find anything online for less than $10-20 per individual book. BOO. I was going to add them to my list of Used Bookstore/Sale Quests, but hunting through vintage nonfiction isn't real fun, and I feel discouraged already. Still. Fingers crossed, yeah?

Comments

( 13 comments — Leave a comment )
muzzy_olorea
Jun. 7th, 2011 08:48 pm (UTC)
I love romcoms. I have seen more than my fair share. Leap Year is possibly one of the worst ones I have seen. Okay, probably not THE worst but it's on the list.

Also, have you seen 'The Proposal' yet?? I feel like it's like FNL where I ask you this so many times that even when you HAVE seen it, I will probably still be sending you comments asking you if you've seen it.

(I remember you being against it because of a certain naked scene in the trailer but trust me the whole film is so tame in general and, c'mon you watch GA!. Plus Sandra Bullock, Ryan Reynolds and Betty White!)
rainbowstevie
Jun. 8th, 2011 04:09 am (UTC)
I love how your comment kicks off a post of totally unexpected Leap Year bashing. I thought it was a lot more universally liked.

As to The Proposal, why I saw it at the library just this week. Oh, you mean watched it. I actually have this thing about being squicked by pairings in which the woman is or seems to be in any way older than the guy, but if you're invested in pushing it on me I will give it a whirl one day, maybe, for the Betty White when the library has nothing else (don't despair. This actually happens about every third visit).

Of course, this is the kind of promise that got me into Leap Year in the first place.
muzzy_olorea
Jun. 8th, 2011 05:44 pm (UTC)
being squicked by pairings in which the woman is or seems to be in any way older than the guy

Look at you and your double standards! ;)

I actually don't think their age difference is so noticeable though! I mean Sandra Bullock is amazing for her age I'm saying that like she's 70 or something ...!) and I actually think that when you get to a certain age, like 30 and above, age difference matters less. It's usually 30 and below where I get squicked easily. Obviously you're the opposite! :)
pink_flame_87
Jun. 7th, 2011 08:49 pm (UTC)
I love your review. Hilarious!

Ok, I don't want to influence you but I have to comment on what you will be viewing next.

Journey to the Center of the Earth...I love Brendan Fraser. I do, I really do. But the thing about this movie is it was the first main release that had the new 3D tech that is everywhere now. The movie was made to showcase that. Unfortunetly I saw it on a drive in theater (now torn down sadly) so no 3D, which made the movie all but pointless as yo-yos being tossed directly at camera are only cool if, you know, they are popping out at you (and rarely then).

Leap Year...it's adorable in that completely cliche rom-com way (full disclosure, I love that ridiculous genre). The thing with this movie is not only was it already a movie with basically the same plot (chasing liberty), but it also starred none other than MATTHEW GOODE). That said...I'd watch either rom-com again, so what do I know?

Edited at 2011-06-07 08:50 pm (UTC)
rainbowstevie
Jun. 8th, 2011 04:14 am (UTC)
Aw, thanks! I actually love romcoms too -- probably watch more of them than anything else -- so maybe it's salvageable after all. Haven't seen Chasing Liberty, but the similarity there cracks me up.

...and now I'm terrified of Journey to the Center of the Earth (although it is really cool that you had access to a drive-in theater!). The DVD has both versions available, so basically, I have to choose between wearing the annoying glasses (do the flimsy cheap paper kind even work right?) and watching ridiculous effects happen?
pink_flame_87
Jun. 8th, 2011 12:24 pm (UTC)
I guess so! I haven't tried watching at home with the paper glasses so couldn't say if they work or not. I just felt like they went really light on things like plot and character development because they were so excited about the new effects and wanted to write the movie around those. Like I said, early in the movie someone is literally yo-yoing directly at camera which looks silly when it's not popping out at you. But Brendan Fraser is always good in these comedy adventure movies and I think you should watch it anyway just so I can read what you think about it. : )

I miss the drive-in so much! We went all the time through my childhood all the way up until last year when they finally closed and tore it down. They just couldn't make any money in this economy even though they were always busy.
dollsome
Jun. 7th, 2011 11:34 pm (UTC)
this film looks boring. Matthew Goode is SO BLAND.

WHAT WHAT WHAT ARE YOU DOING
rainbowstevie
Jun. 8th, 2011 04:03 am (UTC)
SHIELD YOUR EYES. In the very specific universe that is you & me & this film, Amy Adams is a precious charm who will surely make this rom com romp a delight!
rainbowstevie
Jun. 8th, 2011 04:14 am (UTC)
Also, you were supposed to be too distracted by the Mindy Kaling opening to read the rest. PRIORITIZE.
dollsome
Jun. 8th, 2011 05:29 pm (UTC)
I CAN'T BECAUSE IT APPEARS TO BE A VIDEO (?) AND MY INTERNET STRAIGHT UP JUST WOULDN'T LOAD WHATEVER IT WAS. WHYYYYYY, DIALUP! FIE, FIE!
dollsome
Jun. 8th, 2011 05:27 pm (UTC)
Ahhhhh, that's better! ♥
poinsley
Jun. 8th, 2011 12:02 am (UTC)
I do love me some rom coms, but Leap Year was mediocre at best. I stopped watching it as a rom com and viewed it instead as a movie about the beauty of the Irish countryside, and it made it better.

And I like Matthew Goode!
rainbowstevie
Jun. 8th, 2011 04:04 am (UTC)
Oh, that seals it, I am definitely viewing it as a movie about the beauty of the Irish countryside unless and until it overrides that crutch.
( 13 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

June 2019
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow